The Research
Jeevaka.
Malaxis acuminata — a small terrestrial orchid of the Himalayan belt, and the first of the eight Ashtavarga drugs of the classical rasayana literature. It is rare, it is endangered, and for most of a thousand years nobody has been entirely certain which plant the texts meant.
Her work on Jeevaka is the first of its kind in the world: a systematic study of the plant's identity, its classical descriptions, and its conservation.
The Question
The ambiguity is the point.
The classical sources describe Jeevaka's qualities and uses, but the living plant behind the Sanskrit name has been contested for centuries — cited in the modern literature variously as Malaxis acuminata and Microstylis wallichii, with regional substitutes standing in wherever the true drug became scarce.
Settling that question matters twice over. Once for the integrity of the pharmacopoeia — a formulation is only as honest as the identity of its ingredients. And once for conservation — you cannot protect a plant you cannot name with confidence.
The Group
Ashtavarga — the eight.
Eight Himalayan drugs named together in the classical literature, several of them orchids, all of them now rare. Identifications marked contested are exactly where the research lives.
Jeevaka
जीवक
Malaxis acuminata
Orchidaceae
Identification contested
Also cited as Microstylis wallichii
Rishabhaka
ऋषभक
Malaxis muscifera
Orchidaceae
Identification contested
Meda
मेदा
Polygonatum verticillatum
Asparagaceae
Mahameda
महामेदा
Polygonatum cirrhifolium
Asparagaceae
Kakoli
काकोली
Fritillaria roylei
Liliaceae
Identification contested
Ksheerakakoli
क्षीरकाकोली
Lilium polyphyllum
Liliaceae
Identification contested
Riddhi
ऋद्धि
Habenaria intermedia
Orchidaceae
Vriddhi
वृद्धि
Habenaria edgeworthii
Orchidaceae
Status
Where the work stands.
A summary of methodology, findings and publications will be published here as the work allows. Until then, her research profile is the record:
This page describes a research programme. It reports no therapeutic outcome and offers no treatment. Classical attributions are cited as literature, not as claims.